🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to pass a proposal lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended parents to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," said one MEP supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and fit for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely happening at the state level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of Australia and others demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.